The One Nation, One Election Bill suggests holding all major elections—Lok Sabha, state assemblies, and local bodies—together on the same day every five years.
The government says holding all elections together will save money, allow smoother governance, and ensure stable policies, as frequent elections disrupt work and cost too much.
Under this bill, voters would vote for all elections on the same day, use a single voter list, and have local elections held within 100 days of the national polls.
India used to hold all elections together from 1952 to 1967, but the cycle was disrupted due to political instability and early dissolving of governments.
It saves taxpayer money, makes voting easier to encourage more people to vote, and reduces the workload on the election system.
Benefits According to Supporters
Critics say the bill could harm India's federal system, weaken regional parties, and overshadow local issues with national campaigns.
The bill faces challenges as it needs approval from two-thirds of Parliament, support from state legislatures, and careful planning to manage elections all at once.
Supporters believe it will bring progress and stability, while critics worry it will give too much power to the center and weaken regional voices. Can India hold all elections together without losing its federal balance?
The One Nation, One Election Bill is a mix of efficiency and democracy. What do you think? Is it a good move or too much?
Stay Informed! Follow for updates on the One Nation, One Election Bill and more!